<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exploring &#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/</link>
	<description>per aspera ad astra</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:40:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/comment-page-1/#comment-14930</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/#comment-14930</guid>
		<description>Just so you stay updated. It requires a little bit of reverse engineering effort to get it running from Windows 2000 to Windows 7, but it is indeed faster after a first few tests.

Also, this might be the much better method to implement the hardlink support some people have asked for, since a hardlink is just an additional name attribute in the MFT.

// Oliver</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so you stay updated. It requires a little bit of reverse engineering effort to get it running from Windows 2000 to Windows 7, but it is indeed faster after a first few tests.</p>
<p>Also, this might be the much better method to implement the hardlink support some people have asked for, since a hardlink is just an additional name attribute in the MFT.</p>
<p>// Oliver</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jan</title>
		<link>http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/comment-page-1/#comment-14926</link>
		<dc:creator>Jan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 08:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/#comment-14926</guid>
		<description>Sounds really cool, I&#039;m looking forward to it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds really cool, I&#8217;m looking forward to it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/comment-page-1/#comment-14626</link>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/#comment-14626</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to parse the MFT itself, I&#039;m investigating the method of using IRPs sent to the NTFS driver ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to parse the MFT itself, I&#8217;m investigating the method of using IRPs sent to the NTFS driver &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fowl</title>
		<link>http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/comment-page-1/#comment-14624</link>
		<dc:creator>Fowl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.windirstat.info/20090628/exploring/#comment-14624</guid>
		<description>Are you talking about directly reading the MFT / implementing some of NTFS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you talking about directly reading the MFT / implementing some of NTFS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

